On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 15:33 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Since such a check is possible, that's definitely a merge-stopper IMO First, I am not asking that Linus merge this. Everyone needs to relax. Second, we don't know a DMI-based solution will work. I'll check it out. Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver.
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver.
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver.
- References:
- [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver.
- From: Robert Love <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver.
- From: Brian Gerst <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver.
- From: Robert Love <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver.
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver.
- From: Robert Love <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver.
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver.
- From: Robert Love <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver.
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver.
- Prev by Date: Re: Need better is_better_time_interpolator() algorithm
- Next by Date: Re: [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver.
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver.
- Next by thread: Re: [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver.
- Index(es):
