Re: Calling suspend() in halt/restart/shutdown -> not a good idea

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> I'd like to get rid of shutdown callback. Having two copies of code
> (one in callback, one in suspend) is ugly.

Well, it's obviously not a good time for this. First, suspend and
shutdown don't necessarily do the same thing, then it just doesn't work
in practice. So either do it right completely or not at all, but 2.6.13
isn't the place for an half-assed hack that looks like a solution to
you.

I do agree that there are enough similarities between the suspend and
shutdown process that we could use the same callback, but then, please,
at least with a different argument and with drivers beeing fixed to
handle it. Most drivers should probably just "ignore" shutdown anyway.

BTW. I suppose we still have the same constant for PMSG_FREEZE and
PMSG_SUSPEND ? That could have been fixed ages ago and is more important
imho....

Ben.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux