Hi!
> > > Why are we calling driver suspend routines in these ? This is _not_ a
> > > good idea ! On various machines, the mecanisms for shutting down are
> > > quite different from suspend/resume, and current drivers have too many
> > > bugs to make that safe. I keep getting all sort of reports of machines
> > > not shutting down anymore.
> >
> > For example, my Centrino laptop will restart instead of power down with
> > -mm kernels.
> >
> > To "fix" this I can either:
> > - unplug power. Shutdown works when on battery power.
> > - attach an external USB hard disk => power down always works.
> > - remove device_suspend(PMSG_SUSPEND) => power down always works.-
>
> Yes, this is just one of the gazillion setup that got broken by this
> change. Drivers already have a shutdown() callback anyway, and if we
> want to re-use the suspend one, then we need to define some sane
> parameter, not "fake" a system suspend.
I'd like to get rid of shutdown callback. Having two copies of code
(one in callback, one in suspend) is ugly.
Pavel
--
teflon -- maybe it is a trademark, but it should not be.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |