Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.

Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Yes, it kinda makes sense.  Question to Uli: would you put ppoll() into
> glibc as GNU extension?

Of course.  I would rather not add pselect() and deprecate select() than
not adding ppoll().  In fact, we just discussed a similar issue in the
POSIX base working group.  Due to the limitations select() might indeed
get the axe in a future revision.

-- 
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

---

• References:
  • Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
    • From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
  • Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
    • From: jnf <[email protected]>
  • Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
    • From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
  • Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
    • From: bert hubert <[email protected]>
  • Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
    • From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
  • Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
    • From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Dynamic tick for x86 version 050609-2
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC] Observations on x86 process.c
• Previous by thread: Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
• Next by thread: Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]