Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks

["H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>]

Thomas Glanzmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> > Directory hashing slows down operations that do linear sweeps through 
> > the filesystem reading every single file, simply because without 
> > dir_index, there is likely to be a correlation between inode order and 
> > directory order, whereas with dir_index, readdir() returns entries in 
> > hash order.
>
>
> thank you for the awareness training. Than mutt should be slower, too.
> Maybe I should repeat that tests.

Only if you read every single file in each directory every time.  I 
thought mutt did header indexing and thus didn't need to do that.

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/