Hello, > Directory hashing slows down operations that do linear sweeps through > the filesystem reading every single file, simply because without > dir_index, there is likely to be a correlation between inode order and > directory order, whereas with dir_index, readdir() returns entries in > hash order. thank you for the awareness training. Than mutt should be slower, too. Maybe I should repeat that tests. Thomas - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks
- From: Florian Weimer <[email protected]>
- Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks
- From: "Theodore Ts'o" <[email protected]>
- Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks
- References:
- Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks
- From: Magnus Damm <[email protected]>
- Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks
- From: Chris Mason <[email protected]>
- Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks
- From: Florian Weimer <[email protected]>
- Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks
- From: Thomas Glanzmann <[email protected]>
- Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks
- Prev by Date: Re: returning non-ram via ->nopage, was Re: [patch] mspec driver for 2.6.12-rc2-mm3
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC] SAS domain layout for Linux sysfs
- Previous by thread: Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks
- Next by thread: Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks
- Index(es):
 |