* H. Peter Anvin: > While you're doing this anyway, you might want to make sure you enable > -O +dir_index and run fsck -D. Directory hashing has a negative impact on some applications (notably tar and unpatched mutt on large Maildir folders). For git, it's a win because hashing destroys locality anyway. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks
- From: Thomas Glanzmann <[email protected]>
- Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks
- References:
- Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks
- From: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>
- Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks
- From: Chris Mason <[email protected]>
- Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks
- From: Magnus Damm <[email protected]>
- Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks
- From: Chris Mason <[email protected]>
- Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] private mounts
- Next by Date: Doubt Regarding Multithreading and Device Driver
- Previous by thread: Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks
- Next by thread: Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks
- Index(es):
 |