Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: Messed up my ISP/Networkmanager connection !?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Kevin;

On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 01:03 -0400, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
> William Case wrote:
> > Hi Kevin et al;
> > 
> > It just got stranger;
> > 
> > On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 00:07 -0400, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: 
> >> William Case wrote:
> >>> Although my browsers don't work externally they did find
> >>> http://192.168.1.1 which gave me a setup page.  I didn't change anything
> >>> but here is the output:
> >>>
> >>> LAN 
> >>> IP Address 192.168.1.1 
> >>> Subnet Mask 255.255.255.0 
> >>> DHCP Server Enabled Firewall Enabled   
> >>>
> >>> INFORMATION 
> >>> System Time 2008/08/05 21:28:28 
> >>> System Boot Up Time 00000 days 05:17:37 
> >>> Connected Clients 3 
> >>> Runtime Code Version V2.00.0042 
> >>> Boot Code Version V2.00.32 
> >>> LAN MAC Address 00-40-F4-91-17-8C 
> >>> WAN MAC Address 00-40-F4-91-17-8D 
> >>>
> >>>
> > 
> > On re-boot the script messages still show,  -- "setting NetworkManger
> > waiting for network - failed".  Then, "httpd: could not reliably
> > determine the servers fully qualified domain name using 127.0.0.1 for
> > server name."
> > 
> > The little NetworkManager gui in my notification panel shows a red
> > warning with an x and says "No network connection".
> > 
> > Epiphany and FireFox, along with Evolution, start offline.  Putting all
> > three back online gets them all working.  Here is the strange thing.
> > Previously when I put Epiphany and Firefox back online as soon as I
> > started them again they went off line immediately.  This time they
> > stayed on.  I loaded several fresh pages and everything continued to
> > work.
> 
> Something else to look at...  What does your network routing look like?
> Do you have a proper default route?  If not, you won't be able to get 
> beyond your local subnet.
> 
> /sin/route

I have posted the result of route -n earlier.  There is nothing
interesting there. 
]$ route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use
Iface
192.168.1.0     0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0
eth0
169.254.0.0     0.0.0.0         255.255.0.0     U     0      0        0
eth0
0.0.0.0         192.168.1.1     0.0.0.0         UG    0      0        0
eth0

 
> 
> I'm guessing that if NetworkManager isn't doing it right, its not 
> getting setup.  If not, you could try:
> 
> /sbin/route add -net default gw 192.168.1.1
> 
Not necessary.  'route -n' already tells me that 192.168.1.1 is my
gateway.

> (I think that's the correct syntax....)
> 
> > To answer Kevin.  Yes the bill is paid. I have one other machine running
> > Ubuntu with no problem and another on WindowsXP.
> 
> I was kidding!

I figured you were. I didn't take offence -- it is the type of joke I
would have used.  But it was a good enough question that it made me go
and double check that the other two machines were working.  Besides,
Rogers has a habit of partially turning services off to work on them
without telling customers what it is doing.

> 
> > I just shut down and cold rebooted to be sure before sending this post.
> > Every thing is still as above.
> 
> Check your network routing tables.  If you don't tell the networking how 
>   to get there, it doesn't know.
> 
> > A new wrinkle I didn't report, but now Evolution is asking for IP
> > account passwords each time I start it.  It had stopped doing that in
> > Fedora 9.

Remember Kevin, I am getting ISP service.  Everything seems to be
boiling down to a NetworkManager problem.

-- 
Regards Bill;
Fedora 9, Gnome 2.22.3
Evo.2.22.3.1, Emacs 22.2.1

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux