On 11/10/05, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Nat Gross wrote: > > >>What do you called as a standard package? > >> > >> > >Something along the lines of xml schemas/dtd's. > >Every distro should/can have its dtd/schema for the pkg info. If the > >rpm's xml adheres to that schema, its standard. > >I wish I had the time to get in on the yum list, but I have my hands > >full right now. (If you followed my other glibc thread, mysql > >--->oracle, etc.) If anyone wants to file a bugzilla for me, I would > >thank her/him. > > > >-nat > >ps. I am certain everyone is busy, but still... > > > > > > > What you are suggestion or discussing here is not a straight forward bug > report at all. What would be appropriate is to provide the logs, details > and suggestions in the yum devel list to see whats feasible and > appropriate for yum to do when working on non repository packages. Any > such discussions on end user list is going to just get lost in the list > noise after sometime. Fair enough. Hope to follow up on this soon. Thanks; -nat
