Re: Is rhnsd necessary if we're using yum for updates?

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: Is rhnsd necessary if we're using yum for updates?
• From: Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 00:29:23 -0500
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <1077052707.27781.7.camel@scorpio> <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Sender: fedora-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx
• User-agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i

Gregory Woodbury (ggw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> > After stopping rhnsd, these errors disappeared.  (I use up2date, rather
> > than yum, btw).
> 
> Just FYI, up2date is now a front-end to yum!

Erm, up2date supports yum repository information. It's not a frontend
to the yum command at all.

Bill

• References:
  • Is rhnsd necessary if we're using yum for updates?
    • From: Clint Harshaw
  • Re: Is rhnsd necessary if we're using yum for updates?
    • From: David Keen
  • Re: Is rhnsd necessary if we're using yum for updates?
    • From: Gregory Woodbury

• Prev by Date: Re: lvm is needed by (installed) mkinitrd-3.5.14-1
• Next by Date: Re: S3 Prosavage PN133 Video issue during installation (Delia Leal)
• Previous by thread: Re: Is rhnsd necessary if we're using yum for updates?
• Next by thread: applet doesn't load in mozilla/firefox
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread