Re: Is rhnsd necessary if we're using yum for updates?

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: Is rhnsd necessary if we're using yum for updates?
• From: Gregory Woodbury <ggw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 00:25:20 -0500
• In-reply-to: <1077052707.27781.7.camel@scorpio>
• References: <[email protected]> <1077052707.27781.7.camel@scorpio>
• Reply-to: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Sender: fedora-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx
• User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 09:18:27PM +0000, David Keen wrote:
 
> After stopping rhnsd, these errors disappeared.  (I use up2date, rather
> than yum, btw).

Just FYI, up2date is now a front-end to yum!

-- 
Gregory G. "Wolfe" Woodbury      `-_-'    Owner/Admin: wolves.durham.nc.us
ggw at wolves.durham.nc.us         U     RHCT August 2003
"The Line Eater is a boojum snark."     Hug your wolf.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Is rhnsd necessary if we're using yum for updates?
    • From: Bill Nottingham

• References:
  • Is rhnsd necessary if we're using yum for updates?
    • From: Clint Harshaw
  • Re: Is rhnsd necessary if we're using yum for updates?
    • From: David Keen

• Prev by Date: Re: lvm is needed by (installed) mkinitrd-3.5.14-1
• Next by Date: Re: S3 Prosavage PN133 Video issue during installation
• Previous by thread: Re: Is rhnsd necessary if we're using yum for updates?
• Next by thread: Re: Is rhnsd necessary if we're using yum for updates?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread