On 7 November 2010 05:30, Fernando Cassia <fcassia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Piscium <groknok@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 6 November 2010 00:35, Fernando Cassia <fcassia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> In short: according to former Sun employees, Sun had around 100 people >>> working on OpenOffice.org. 30 of those left and went to work with >>> LibreOffice. That's 30% of the work force. Sounds to me like >>> OpenOffice.org still has got the edge. >> >> Do you have a reference for that? > > Yes. Well, can you share a link with us? I find it hard to believe that sun had a 100-strong team on OO, but I am ready to be proved wrong. This is an interesting article on LWN: http://lwn.net/Articles/407339/ In particular see this comment: --------- "Posted Sep 28, 2010 20:43 UTC (Tue) by neilbrown (subscriber, #359) [Link] I thought I would test this new openness to contributions. 3 yeas ago I filed a bug report with code fix included. http://tools.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80637 Result: nothing. Last night I sent a patch with that code fix to the new project. Result: it is in the git tree already. This looks promising!!!" --------- This seems to indicate that interaction with the community was not going well, or else that the OO team was so small that need not have time to examine and take a small patch. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
