On 10/13/2010 12:02 PM, Dj YB wrote:
OK, I compared it to the RSS of Firefox, with 6 windows, and averageOn Wednesday October 13 2010 20:40:05 JD wrote:On 10/13/2010 11:24 AM, Kwan Lowe wrote:On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Dj YB<yehielb@xxxxxxx> wrote:tried the fedora-kde list first but got no response. whenever I look at the processes table I see that kglobalaccel is taking about 125 MB of memory, that is a lot. I admit that I have lot's of shortcuts and gestures, but still, is that number normal?Determining how much memory is used by a single PID is tricky. In the case of KDE, which has a lot of shared code, it's even trickier. Much of the memory footprint seen in ps might be in libraries shared by other KDE apps on the system.Yehiel, what is the RSS (Resident Set Size) for kglobalaccel ?PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 2480 djyb 20 0 183m 127m 4048 S 0.0 12.7 0:49.64 kglobalaccel according to top, 127m, I guess that 127MB of 4 tabs per window. The RSS for firefox is 183m which is very reasonable. I do not know what kglobalaccel does, and it has no man page, and I do not run it. What is your total physical ram and how much swap space do you have? If you absolutely must have this app running, I think you will have accept it's mem usage as normal. PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 2539 jd 20 0 698m 182m 30m S 7.3 9.0 23:00.45 firefox 3862 jd 20 0 277m 12m 9964 S 2.6 0.6 0:04.76 gnome-terminal 1832 root 20 0 174m 35m 6984 S 2.0 1.7 3:51.51 Xorg |
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
