On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Dj YB <yehielb@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > tried the fedora-kde list first but got no response. > > whenever I look at the processes table I see that kglobalaccel is taking about > 125 MB of memory, that is a lot. > I admit that I have lot's of shortcuts and gestures, but still, is that number > normal? Determining how much memory is used by a single PID is tricky. In the case of KDE, which has a lot of shared code, it's even trickier. Much of the memory footprint seen in ps might be in libraries shared by other KDE apps on the system. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
