On 10/13/2010 11:24 AM, Kwan Lowe wrote: > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Dj YB<yehielb@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> tried the fedora-kde list first but got no response. >> >> whenever I look at the processes table I see that kglobalaccel is taking about >> 125 MB of memory, that is a lot. >> I admit that I have lot's of shortcuts and gestures, but still, is that number >> normal? > Determining how much memory is used by a single PID is tricky. In the > case of KDE, which has a lot of shared code, it's even trickier. Much > of the memory footprint seen in ps might be in libraries shared by > other KDE apps on the system. Yehiel, what is the RSS (Resident Set Size) for kglobalaccel ? -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
