On 08/17/2010 11:33 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 08/15/2010 09:15 PM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: >> >> My 11:00 email got marked as [SPAM], here are the email headers: > ... >>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, >>> FRT_ADOBE2,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,NUMERIC_HTTP_ADDR,SPF_PASS,URI_HEX autolearn=no >>> version=3.3.1 >>> Received: from kjc386.framingham.ma.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) >>> by kjc386.framingham.ma.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o7G312re009755 >>> (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) >>> for<root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 23:01:02 -0400 >>> Received: (from root@localhost) >>> by kjc386.framingham.ma.us (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o7G312a1009752 >>> for root; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 23:01:02 -0400 > ... >> [I'm wondering *why* it says [SPAM] if the X-Spam-Status score is 0.3?] > > We can see that the ALL_TRUSTED rule matched and the spam-status is > "no", so I think what's happening is that the milter is being run twice. > The first run isn't hitting ALL_TRUSTED and is setting the standard > SpamAssassin headers and modifying Subject: while the second run > replaces the previous SpamAssassin headers with new results. > > We can also see that you've got to Received lines. The second indicates > ESMTP transport and assigns a new queue ID. > >> Do I need to use localhost or kjc386.framingham.ma.us as the hostname >> for the whitelist_from_rcvd line? > > I think you want localhost. If I'm reading it correctly, you're hitting > the trusted_networks setting, but not the whitelist_from_rcvd that > you've set. I did that yesterday. No new SPAM markings on my hourly emails, though some of my other admin emails are now getting marked as [SPAM], like a couple of denyhosts reports. One of them had a -2.6 SPAM level.... >> BTW, I get all of root's emails sent to me through a sendmail alias. If >> that matters.... > > Out of curiosity, what does the alias look like? Re-sending the message > by SMTP and running the milter twice is pretty inefficient. I wonder if > that's done by the milter in order to allow per-user configuration > settings? I don't know enough about the implementation of the SA milter > to say... The alias is the one that Fedora has me set up. In /etc/aliases: # Person who should get root's mail root: cummings Very simple. -- Kevin J. Cummings kjchome@xxxxxxx cummings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx cummings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Registered Linux User #1232 (http://counter.li.org) -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
