[RHEL question] why is beta 2 so much smaller?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



  slightly off-topic but i don't have the heart to subscribe to yet
another mailing list -- i want to download the latest beta (2?) of
RHEL 6, and i've ended up here:

ftp://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/rhel/beta/6Server-beta2/x86_64/iso/

where i can see the two ISO images:

RHEL6.0-20100622.1-Server-x86_64-DVD1.iso  3.9GB
RHEL6.0-20100715.2-Server-x86_64-DVD1.iso  3.2GB

  based on the datestamps in the filenames, i would think that second
ISO is the latest x86_64 image, but it looks odd that it's
significantly smaller than the earlier one.  or am i misinterpreting
what i'm looking at?  thanks.

rday

p.s.  the above is for the server version.  over at the workstation
version:

ftp://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/rhel/beta/6Workstation-beta2/x86_64/iso/

things look more reasonable.  or at least what i might have expected.

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                               Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

        Top-notch, inexpensive online Linux/OSS/kernel courses
                        http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
-- 
users mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux