Re: [RHEL question] why is beta 2 so much smaller?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Robert P. J. Day writes:

> 
>   slightly off-topic but i don't have the heart to subscribe to yet
> another mailing list -- i want to download the latest beta (2?) of
> RHEL 6, and i've ended up here:
> 
> ftp://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/rhel/beta/6Server-beta2/x86_64/iso/
> 
> where i can see the two ISO images:
> 
> RHEL6.0-20100622.1-Server-x86_64-DVD1.iso  3.9GB
> RHEL6.0-20100715.2-Server-x86_64-DVD1.iso  3.2GB
> 
>   based on the datestamps in the filenames, i would think that second
> ISO is the latest x86_64 image, but it looks odd that it's
> significantly smaller than the earlier one.  or am i misinterpreting
> what i'm looking at?  thanks.

Curious case indeed. Although it's a bit offtopic for this list, feel free 
to reply with your findings :-)


--
Nux!
www.nux.ro

-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux