Around 03:33pm on Friday, July 30, 2010 (UK time), David scrawled: > So that's one example which you 'documented' well. My complaint(s) are > with the vague claims that some make but then never show any proof. > Which I am seeing more and more of these days. Ouch, presumably that is aimed at me for since I made the first reference to "Driver Hell" in an email I sent this morning (UK time), however I have had to keep you waiting while I went to work :-) However so I do not intend to document instances of problems with Windows drivers on this list. I have seen them (as well as problems with drivers on GNU/Linux), and a quick Google reveals one or two. I suspect that are not that far apart on our thoughts where this relates to Fedora - I certainly do not think Fedora should be blamed if hardware is no longer compatible with a new release, or if software provided by a third party such as RPMFusion stops working. I also feel that if the use of closed propriety drivers are that critical to someones computer use then they should be usimg a more stable distro than Fedora. Steve -- Play Champions - my free football predictions game at: http://www.stevesearle.com/champs/about.html 15:51:08 up 27 days, 4:02, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.03, 0.00
Attachment:
pgpQ6HHVhaSUL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
