Re: Still no kmod for new nvidia

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/29/10 7:56 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 23:48:57 -0400,
>    Paul Allen Newell<pnewell@xxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
>    
>> If doing a "black-box" only job of "reverse engineering" requires one to
>> load memory with a trademark, how does this fall into the realm of
>> acceptable?
>>      
> There was a court case where a company was using a copyrighted phrase
> for access control. A competitor won when they also used the same phrase
> for access control purposes.
>
> That was a long time ago and people seemed to feel that when a customer
> bought something, they owned it. In today's environment that case might
> have gone differently.
>
>    
Bruno:

Thank you for the additional background ... especially the "long time 
ago" qualification.

Paul
-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux