On 07/19/2010 04:41 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 09:53:51 -0700,
>> Michael Miles<mmamiga6@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> I have been waiting to see if a kmod comes available and there seems to
>>> be the wrong one published by RPMfusion.
>>>
>> Fedora doesn't produce the kmod. You really should be asking about this on
>> the RPMfusion mailiing lists.
>>
> This is true, but to the extent that some people can't use the recent kernel
> until a working video driver is available, it is a Fedora issue. Updates which
> have security implications really shouldn't have to run in R/L 3 as text only. I
> don't need 3D accelerated anythings to run a few simple xterms and load
> monitoring, but not having X at all is an upgrade stopper. I'm running radeon,
> but more than a few systems which ran well on FC9 need to use VESA modes or even
> a laptop a VNC. The support for ATI and Nvidia hardware only a few years old is
> spotty at best.
>
> Good suggestion, though, he won't get any help here.
>
>
I am finding it hard to deal with as RPMFusion and Fedora are two
seperate thing but when it blocks a update then yes I do think it is a
Fedora issue.
Anyway I have waiting to do
The problem is that there is a kmod but instead of 195.36.31-2 the label
for the new kmod 195.36.31-1
This is confusing as the driver does not end with -1 but a -2
Thanks for agreeing anyway
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
