Re: Another funny update?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/16/2010 08:02 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 19:52:49 -0400,
>    Marcel Rieux<m.z.rieux@xxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
>    
>> Isn't RPMfusion preparing its upcoming module according to the kernel
>> version that is in Testing? I would think that RPMfusion has a nice working
>> module for kernel 2.6.32.10-92.fc12. Since Fedora decided instead to update
>> with 2.6.32.14-127.fc12 without a warning ,they might decide to never
>> provide the module for this kernel.
>>      
> They have other ways to see what kernels are being built. They also should
> notice that the testing version is older and that some sort of oops occured
> and not waste their time making a kmod for it.
>
>    
>> If there was no way, Fedora should provide excuses. Or, if Fedora doesn't
>> want to play the game with RPMfusion because NVIDIA drivers are not open
>> source, they should say so and everybody will move to Nouveau. People using
>> Fedora will know that NVIDIA drivers are not available.
>>      
> Fedora pretty much does say people should use Nouveau. Some people need
> more performance and using the RPMFusion versions to do that. However
> doing that has trade offs. Using those drivers cause problems and people
> hopefully are making intelligent decisions about whether or not that using
> them is a good trade off.
>
>    
>> What is unacceptable is the present situation, where you can't get a shade
>> of an explanation as to what happened. From a serious distro, this is
>> totally unacceptable.
>>      
> You continue to complain to the wrong people. RPMFusion supports the
> rpms for the proprietary nVidia drivers and if you want anything to
> change, you should be complaining to them, as they are the ones that
> need to fix things.
>
>    
>> So, let me ask: why wasn't the kernel in testing released? If the one that
>> has finally been offered was deemed better, why wasn't it put in testing
>> before release?
>>      
> I usually run kernels from the Koji builds so I don't know which kernels
> were in testing and updates in what order. However if you want to be able
> to make some guesses you might try reading the change logs in the kernel
> spec file. (You can see them on koji without having to download the srpms.)
>    
Without the Nvidia drivers there is no support for Cuda and shaders

If you want to  over clock your video card you are shit out of luck with 
nouveau
I can understand Fedora developing the nouveau drivers but getting the 
full benefit out of a very fast Nvidia card is nil with nouveau.

I sure hope the kmod is made and delivered by rpmfusion because without 
it I will not use the new kernel if I have to fall back to nouveau

This is the first kernel update I have seen where there is no kmod for 
nvidia


Here's to hoping
-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux