Re: Adobe (Temporarily?) Kills 64-Bit Flash For Linux

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



--- On Mon, 6/14/10, Steve Underwood <steveu@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 06/14/2010 12:54 PM, Patrick
> Bartek wrote:
> > --- On Sun, 6/13/10, Bill Davidsen<davidsen@xxxxxxx> 
> wrote:
> >
> >    
> >> That isn't going to make people very
> >> happy.
> >>
> >> http://linux.slashdot.org/story/10/06/11/1338207/Adobe-Temporarily-Kills-64-Bit-Flash-For-Linux
> >>      
> > Guess I'll just continue to use 10.0 R45 Beta 64-bit
> like I have been since February when it was released. 
> I works well enough for me.  Yes, it crashes sometimes,
> but not often.  In fact, since I cleaned Totem (and its
> related/unneeded dependencies) off my system--first with F9
> and then with F12--in favor of mplayer, I've had a lot less
> video streaming/playing problems.
> >
> > However, I still have that
> Hulu-won't-play-with-64bit-Flash problem, except by using
> their 64-bit desktop player.
> >
> > B
> >    
> This might be OK if they hadn't admitted that the version
> you are 
> running has some huge security hole.

I thought 10.1 was the one with the problem.  In any case, I don't think the "hole" will cause much problems with Linux based systems.  When you read of the panic attacks people are having, it's usually about Windows systems.

B
-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines



[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux