--- On Mon, 6/14/10, Steve Underwood <steveu@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 06/14/2010 12:54 PM, Patrick > Bartek wrote: > > --- On Sun, 6/13/10, Bill Davidsen<davidsen@xxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > > > >> That isn't going to make people very > >> happy. > >> > >> http://linux.slashdot.org/story/10/06/11/1338207/Adobe-Temporarily-Kills-64-Bit-Flash-For-Linux > >> > > Guess I'll just continue to use 10.0 R45 Beta 64-bit > like I have been since February when it was released. > I works well enough for me. Yes, it crashes sometimes, > but not often. In fact, since I cleaned Totem (and its > related/unneeded dependencies) off my system--first with F9 > and then with F12--in favor of mplayer, I've had a lot less > video streaming/playing problems. > > > > However, I still have that > Hulu-won't-play-with-64bit-Flash problem, except by using > their 64-bit desktop player. > > > > B > > > This might be OK if they hadn't admitted that the version > you are > running has some huge security hole. I thought 10.1 was the one with the problem. In any case, I don't think the "hole" will cause much problems with Linux based systems. When you read of the panic attacks people are having, it's usually about Windows systems. B -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
