On 06/14/2010 11:20 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote: > --- On Mon, 6/14/10, Steve Underwood<steveu@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> On 06/14/2010 12:54 PM, Patrick >> Bartek wrote: >> >>> --- On Sun, 6/13/10, Bill Davidsen<davidsen@xxxxxxx> >>> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>> That isn't going to make people very >>>> happy. >>>> >>>> http://linux.slashdot.org/story/10/06/11/1338207/Adobe-Temporarily-Kills-64-Bit-Flash-For-Linux >>>> >>>> >>> Guess I'll just continue to use 10.0 R45 Beta 64-bit >>> >> like I have been since February when it was released. >> I works well enough for me. Yes, it crashes sometimes, >> but not often. In fact, since I cleaned Totem (and its >> related/unneeded dependencies) off my system--first with F9 >> and then with F12--in favor of mplayer, I've had a lot less >> video streaming/playing problems. >> >>> However, I still have that >>> >> Hulu-won't-play-with-64bit-Flash problem, except by using >> their 64-bit desktop player. >> >>> B >>> >>> >> This might be OK if they hadn't admitted that the version >> you are >> running has some huge security hole. >> > I thought 10.1 was the one with the problem. In any case, I don't think the "hole" will cause much problems with Linux based systems. When you read of the panic attacks people are having, it's usually about Windows systems. > > B > I believe 10.1 is supposed to be the "big fix" for problems in 10.0.<something>. They wouldn't have release 10.1 last Friday if it was supposed to have the serious fault they reported a few days before, would they? You cut the part of my message where I said 10.1 on a 32 bit machine appears to be causing kernel faults. If it can do that, who know what nasty things it could do if its insecure. Steve -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
