Le 03/06/2010 07:04, Rahul Sundaram a écrit : >> If a package does not get negative karma, I think the 2-week-wait / >> push-to-stable treatment is reasonable. YMMV. +1 > With the exception of critical security and bug fixes which needs to be > tested but for a shorter period of time. +1 I also encounter some very bad user experience - A user ask for a new branch / version of a package - I do the job and push it to updates-testing - After a few weeks, no feedback Really frustrated... :( So, I could have left it in testing forever, but I prefer to push it to stable (no bad karma), mainly because I don't want to manage a too long list of packages waiting in testing... Karma is really a great tool, but not enough used... + P.S. an example https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mysql++-3.0.9-4.el5 -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
