On Sun, 30 May 2010 21:39:07 +0000 (UTC) Andre Robatino wrote: > > Any idea why some sites think the 64 bit flash > > is a version number < 9? > > Do you get the same error if flash isn't installed at all? I just tried it, and I get an "install missing plugins" prompt from firefox with no flash installed. One page that can [could] consistently reproduce the problem for me is: http://www.palmbeachpost.com/ Scroll down a ways and there is a video player area on the left side where I get the version error when using 64bit flash. But wait! Since I uninstalled flash to check that error, I tried copying the 64bit plugin back to /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins again so I could see the exact error, and now I get video :-). It really is mysterious. I wonder if version problems were another mysterious side effect from: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597648 I do have a bind mount now for /home instead of a symlink. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
