On 04/18/2010 02:28 PM, Craig White wrote: > On Sun, 2010-04-18 at 13:58 -0700, jdow wrote: > > >>> I think that it is a must to have protection on your machines >>> considering I am looking at a machine that was supposed to be bullet >>> proof, and proved to be infectable with windows crap through wine. If >>> you are running wine without protection then you are taking a chance. >>> I am not sure how it happened but it did. >>> >>> >>> The Virus even went to work renaming core files from the xp install >>> >> To be fair we've not determined exactly whether the files are something >> wine installed rather than a virus. If wine has not been used much, >> particularly for browsing or email, then I'd suspect "rpm -qf" on those >> files would show that they are part of wine. >> > ---- > not possible because 'drive_c' is actually created when you execute wine > for the first time (or subsequent user creation) and thus... > > $ rpm -qf /home/craig/.wine/drive_c/windows/twain_32.dll > file /home/craig/.wine/drive_c/windows/twain_32.dll is not owned by any > package > > is the only answer that one could ever have. > > Seems as though it must have something to do with something that he > did/has on his Windows files/network or as I really suspect, a false > alarm and alterations caused by some anti-virus program and this is all > just mental masturbation of the kind that seems peculiarly unique to > Windows. > > Craig > > > Has been nuked Got rid of wine all together Virtualbox as well. If I am going to run windows products I will do it in it's own PC and that's that. Too bad I really liked virtualbox Re ran scans with Avira , Bitdefender for unices and Clamav All clear for now Thank you all for your input and I hope these machines stay clear -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
