Re: Firefox not running : unable to load XPCOM (was Re:)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2010/4/4 Suvayu Ali <fatkasuvayu+linux@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Saturday 03 April 2010 10:28 PM, Craig White wrote:
>> On Sat, 2010-04-03 at 22:20 -0700, Suvayu Ali wrote:
>>> Hi Don,
>>>
>>> That actually helps a lot. :)
>>>
>>> On Saturday 03 April 2010 09:49 PM, Don Vogt wrote:
>>>>> I would like to avoid removing and installing again firefox and
>>>>> xulrunner, but maybe as last option it would work :-?
>>>>
>>>>>    Regards,
>>>>
>>>>> David
>>>>
>>>> After removing and re-installing xulrunner (which removed and re-installed firefox again ), I ran firefox from a terminal and got back a little bit more info than before.
>>>>
>>>> firefox
>>>> /usr/bin/mozilla-plugin-config: line 73:  3364 Segmentation fault      $WRAPPER_LIB_DIR/nspluginwrapper/plugin-config -f>   /dev/null 2>&1
>>>> Couldn't load XPCOM.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> the lines near line 73 are:
>>>>
>>>> # Set-up installed plugins
>>>> if [ $# -eq 0 ]; then
>>>>       $WRAPPER_LIB_DIR/nspluginwrapper/plugin-config -f>   /dev/null 2>&1
>>>> else
>>>>       $WRAPPER_LIB_DIR/nspluginwrapper/plugin-config $*
>>>> fi
>>>>
>>>
>>> 'nspluginwrapper' usually should be avoided unless you can't absolutely
>>> do without it. Since you mentioned you don't have any add-ons other than
>>> Adblock Plus installed and you are on a 32 bit system, I would presume
>>> you don't need nspluginwrapper.
>>>
>>> As a confirmatory step could you check whether you have nspluginwrapper
>>> installed using the following command?
>>>
>>> $ yum list installed nspluginwrapper
>>>
>>> If that lists it as installed, I would suggest removing it. To remove
>>> try this, (as root)
>>>
>>> # yum remove nspluginwrapper
>>>
>>>> As usual, that doesn't help me at all. Any ideas?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hopefully this will solve your problems. :)
>> ----
>> probably but to be honest, I haven't been tracking this problem but
>> generally, you can just nuke the file,
>> ~/.mozilla/firefox/YOUR_SALTED_PROFILE/pluginreg.dat and it will be
>> rebuilt on the next Firefox startup.
>>
>> and more to the point, you can temporarily move your whole ~/.mozilla
>> folder to another name and it will be created again which is a very
>> quick way to test if something in your .mozilla/firefox directory is
>> causing a problem. Don't nuke this folder unless you are prepared to
>> lose your bookmarks, passwords, etc.
>>
>
> Both of these were among the first things suggested to the OP. :) But
> they didn't make any difference. I think this is one of the problems
> with nspluginwrapper, since its installation is system-wide it is very
> difficult to isolate when it malfunctions. All the usual troubleshooting
> methodology starts failing.

Actually everything looked fine on Don's system.

> Thankfully Don was very observant and picked up on the error message in
> the terminal. Otherwise even knowing that its installed would have been
> difficult to guess over emails. Lets hope the problem is isolated now,
> and can be resolved.

I agree the best option is to get rid of nspluginwrapper: Don is not
using it at all and it triggers an error (perfect match!). If it
doesn't work, then I would focus in outputs from package-cleanup to
inspect suspicious packages installed (there is some livna related
packages and others (fc10/11) that can lead to confusion or
misconfiguration)

Regards,

David
-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux