Re: FPL steps down: what's the real story?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2010-04-03 at 09:52 -0700, suvayu ali wrote:
> On 3 April 2010 09:01, Craig White <craigwhite@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2010-04-03 at 02:03 -0400, Marcel Rieux wrote:
> >>
> >> Though Red Hat is doing fine now, I believe it would be better off
> >> questioning its development model before problems arise. By then, it's
> >> usually too late to fix them. That's not how business work.
> > ----
> > There is no point to a having a discussion with someone that doesn't
> > understand what they are talking about.
> >
> 
> I believe its not a discussion if one or more parties have already
> made up their mind. ;)
> 
> FWIW, AFAIK the kernel project and all of GNU also work through contributors. ;)
----
GNU obviously is volunteer but I think that it's commonly reported now
that the majority of code being written for the Linux kernel is by
corporate paid people.

http://www.osnews.com/story/22786/75_of_Linux_Code_Written_by_Paid_Developers

Is this the 'kernel project' you are speaking about?

Craig


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux