On 28/02/10 04:59 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > On Saturday 27 February 2010 09:21:35 pm Suvayu Ali wrote: >> On 27/02/10 07:05 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: >>> ... >>> version of it (yet). Later on I tainted it again when installing >>> dependencies for Wolfram Mathematica package I use. >>> >>> If there weren't for closed source software which depends on 32bit >>> libraries, I'd be having a clean 64bit-only system. >> >> I run F11 x86_64 and there are *zero* 32 bit libraries on my machine. I >> recently installed Mathematica from the Wolfram supplied binary for a >> friend. I however did not need to install any 32 bit dependencies. Are >> you sure about their dependence on 32 bit libraries? > > Umm, well, yes, I needed this specifically: > > compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-68.i686 > > This package provides libstdc++.so.5 which is needed by Mma 6.0.3. Maybe in > ... > > Maybe this can be avoided somehow, but it wasn't obvious to me. Or maybe Mma > was just looking for the library in /usr/lib instead of /usr/lib64, which > would account as a bug, possibly resolved in version 7? I didn't have enough Thats it! I installed Mathematica 7. Maybe they fixed the issue. AFAIK the installer script supposedly supports both architectures. > Best, :-) > Marko -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
