inode0 wrote: > It if were brand new they could do whatever they pleased to create it. > But it isn't brand new. And it isn't just two businesses who can tell > their paid staff what to work on tomorrow. How long has MeeGo be around for? > Does Fedora bicker over > which shell it wants? Does Red Hat require the shell to be bash? Who > makes that decision? This is getting as silly as the arguments over > rpm now. Precisely what I was driving at. > > I think if we compare how Fedora's "corporate sponsor" has gone about > helping to create, foster, and empower its community and compare that > with the Nokia/maemo relationship there are valuable things to be > learned. > I couldn't agree with you more, but there is hope in that Nokia is pairing up on the effort and wishes to expand (explore?). -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
