Konstantin Svist wrote:
You're right, I am assuming he was talking about the nvidia modules which are
not GPL, when he mentioned 18.104.22.168+Nvidia. So it would only me tainted if he
wanted to have graphics. Or the licensing may have changed, things are not the
same for long.
On 12/31/2009 09:10 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
And leaves you with no Fedora patches and the disk performance
regression issues of 2.6.32. Also a tainted kernel which some
developers will ignore if you get a trace, etc.
I thought it's only tainted if there are non-GPL modules compiled in.
For instance, I saw the tainted message whenever I insmod'ed fglrx driver
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
fedora-list mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list