Re: F10 rpm of grub2 completely broken

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 22:04:19 -0500, Gene wrote:

> >> I did have F12 installed, 64 bit version, but it was (pick a number * 10)
> >> slower than the 32 bit F10 install.
> >
> >Based on what measurements? What tools did you use to determine that it
> >was slower?
> 
> click on a window close button, pick up empty coffee cup & walk to kitchen & 
> refill it, get back to viewing the monitor in about a minute and another 30 
> seconds goes by before the window closes.  That is slow by any definition.

More importantly, this doesn't sound normal by any definition. What you
describe is not supposed to be like that, not when comparing 32-bit F10
with 64-bit F12 and not either when taking into account any 3rd party
video drivers. It should be rather obvious that you've run into some
special problem.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux