Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 05:43 +0500, gilpel@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >>> Codecs that can be included by everybody and good quality (good), >>> >> codecs >> >>> that are of not good enough quality (bad), misc (bad-extras), codecs >>> >> that > are good quality but have patent issues (ugly) and finally a >> interface to > ffmeg (gstreamer-ffmeg). >> >> Why is it impossible to include the "ugly" equivalent for MPlayer? >> This, >> and only this, is what I don't understand. >> > > You don't understand why they have patent issues or you don't understand > why patent issues are a problem for Fedora? > > Both? :-) -- Work without a vision is slavery, Vision without work is a pipe dream, But vision with work is the hope of the world. Mei-Mei.Greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx http://tw.youtube.com/watch?v=cCSz_koUhSg
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
