On 07/28/2009 02:36 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote: >> > Antonio seems to have clearly identified the GPL paragraphs which are > not followed, IANAL but I don't think there's a option to "discard" > complaints. Yes, there is. Invalid complaints are discarded all the time. If the author disagrees, he is free to go to court over it. I confess I never really looked at that part of the GPL > before, but it seems to say what Antonio says it does. Then read the GPL first and consult with a lawyer if you are in doubt. It is hard enough to form a informed opinion after reading it. Making a judgement without even reading it seems premature. >> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2009-July/msg00000.html >> > In any case RH has decided that they can ignore this rather than stop > using the name and resolve it. The complaint was never about the name. Even assuming cdrecord is a trademark (which it isn't), symlinks are hardly a legal issue. There is no point in pretending it is. Rahul -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
