Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 07/25/2009 05:07 AM, Antonio Olivares wrote:
http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/linux-dist.html
Who is right?
Can both sides be right?
The cdrecord maintainer makes many such claims but fails to provide
references. That is very suspect. He tried to do the same thing in
Fedora Legal as well. His claims were discarded.
Antonio seems to have clearly identified the GPL paragraphs which are not
followed, IANAL but I don't think there's a option to "discard" complaints. I
confess I never really looked at that part of the GPL before, but it seems to
say what Antonio says it does.
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2009-July/msg00000.html
In any case RH has decided that they can ignore this rather than stop using the
name and resolve it.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
