Re: eth0 alias issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
>
> Dumb question - shouldn't DEVICE be eth0 in both files? I thought it
> was the name of the physical device.
>
> DEVICE=<name of physical device (except dynamically-allocated PPP
>       devices where it is the "logical name")>
>
>   
You're correct - I wasn't paying attention.  I've tried it without
specifying DEVICE in ifcfg-eth0:1 but came up with the same results.

Thanks,
Tom

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux