Fennix wrote: > Somehow I am disappointed to see all of this. G does not write often > but does so when he does think that it is worth offering a usefull > contribution to a problem at hand. For some to try and to tar him with > the association/way of doing things such as Karl definitely is in error. > He is far more knowledgeable about Unix and Linux than Karl and has > show this in his emails. He does not write as Karl has done to complain > of many issues based on incomplete understanding of Linux and > specifically of Fedora. Normally I only see G's responses when he is > offering useful information to some question at hand. I am not sure I > have ever seen him complain except in response to an email (perhaps > unreasonably) attacking him on some question. > He does have the support of Ann Wilson (a message long ago) and she is > one that is close to the top of my list of "respected" posters to this > group. David, I do understand the basis of your complaint regarding > delays caused by usage of GPG public keys which are not registered which > leads to very lengthy delays, and I also can see from G's response his > reasoning for his current way of sending emails to this list using a GPG > signature (key offered on request (manual)). I would be very sorry to > not have the privelage of G's advice on this list as it always has been > usefull and concise.... Hopefully we can all be more open minded on this > question. > Fennix Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
