Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 08:55 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: >> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >> >> > My reading was that he worried about *non-KDE* apps doing similar >> > things without any interaction with Akonadi. >> > >> > So there are now two independant databases, one in KDE and one in >> > Gnome. Those of us who use a mixture of apps are running both of them. >> >> If it matters, akonadi was designed to be DE-independent, with no kde >> dependencies (other than qt). > > Is this because it uses qt to talk to the other KDE apps? Just curious. akonadi needed a core toolkit to use, and qt happens to fit the bill nicely. KDE apps speak akonadi'ese, not the other way around. Non-kde apps could just as well use akonadi too, which is the whole point of the exercise of making it DE-independent. -- Rex -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
