On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Antonio Olivares wrote:Not so much, I did an alpha install and it worked really well. A few days later I did an update (with "yum upgrade") and it hung during the upgrade never to boot again in any way. No, I mean any way, no POST, no way into BIOS, dead.
--- On Mon, 2/16/09, Clemens Eisserer <linuxhippy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Clemens Eisserer <linuxhippy@xxxxxxxxx>Yes, pretty much. We are running 2.6.29rcX kernels :)
Subject: Does Fedora11-alpha contain Linux-2.6.29rc?
To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Monday, February 16, 2009, 9:25 AM
Hi,
Does Fedora11-Alpha use RC versions of 2.6.29, or still
stick to
2.6.28 until 2.6.29 is released?
The reason I ask is that the Intel driver is horriblyWe hope many things get better as well :) Enjoying the ride with rawhide!
broken with
2.6.28's GEM stuff, and I hope things got better until
now.
I pulled the disk and cleared the MBR and partition table, still wouldn't even POST, cleared the NV memory, reflashed the BIOS, dropped back to FC10.
No complaint, I know it's alpha, but that was the most hosed system I have ever seen. At least that I was able to recover w/o replacing hardware. Shuttle with Celeron and Sis chipset, and *NO* I don't want to continue testing. ;-)
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
I do think there is something wrong with your hardware.
--
南无楞严会上佛菩萨！南无楞严会上佛菩萨！南无楞严会上佛菩萨！
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
