On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Arthur Pemberton wrote: >> Taking note that 'removed functionality' is not the same as 'has not >> yet been added back', what functionality do you need that has been >> removed from KDE 4.x? > > If it hadn't been removed, it wouldn't need adding back. Well just needs adding, not adding back. They started the code base fresh as far as I understand... which means it hasn't been removed. > Proper dual-head support is the omission that affects me the most right > now. This is an area in which KDE 3.5 is far ahead of GNOME. OTOH, I > find KDE 4 to be completely unusable on a dual-head setup. I thought dual head was mostly an X issue. -- Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin ( www.pembo13.com ) -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
