On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 00:41 -0600, Arthur Pemberton wrote: > On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 9:42 PM, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 09:49 -0700, stan wrote: > >> Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > This is not what Fedora once was meat to be. > >> > >> Please, let's have some perspective here. Fedora becomes > >> what the people doing the work want Fedora to become. > > No, Fedora became what people made it. > > > > My impression is, Fedora once had been a nice "leading edge distro", > > now it's essentially a public testing ground, containing the "beyond > > bleeding edge". > > > Hmm. I guess this is where we disagree. You think that this is a bad > thing. I think it is not. Following your logic, based on your > assessment, Fedora has become what it is out of a sort of evolution. Agreed, but consider, evolution is a continuous process and we all are part of it. > I have no problem with this. I really don't mind it. I have. Fedora has reached a point of immaturity/lack of stability, I am having real problems in finding it suitable for my purposes, i.e. the basis of my motivation to participate in Fedora is gradually breaking away. > I actually quite like it. Well, my hope is, Fedora 10, like it's predecessors, will reach a "usable" shape several weeks/months after its initial releases. ATM, the sad truth is, I would have to lie when recommending Fedora 10 to anybody. Ralf -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
