Re: F10 question with nvidia card

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday, Dec 8th 2008 at 20:19 -0000, quoth Christopher A. Williams:

=>On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 17:46 -0500, Chris Snook wrote:
=>> Steven W. Orr wrote:
=>> > I upgraded to F10 and now I need to get my nvidia card working. I ran
=>> > 
=>> > yum install kmod-nvidia
=>> > 
=>> > which went fine except that I still don't have the gl graphics working.
=>> > 
=>> > 514 > rpm -ql kmod-nvidia
=>> > (contains no files)
=>> > 
=>> > 
=>> > Ok, that's odd. So I then naively tried
=>> > 
=>> > [root@saturn ~]# rpm -e kmod-nvidia
=>> > error: Failed dependencies:
=>> >         kmod-nvidia >= 173.14.12-5.lvn9.1 is needed by (installed) 
=>> > kmod-nvidia-2.6.26.6-79.fc9.i686-173.14.12-5.lvn9.1.i686
=>> >         kmod-nvidia >= 177.82-1.fc10.4 is needed by (installed) 
=>> > kmod-nvidia-2.6.27.5-117.fc10.i686-177.82-1.fc10.4.i686
=>> > [root@saturn ~]#
=>> > 
=>> > 
=>> > Since this is an upgrade, shouldn't the package be installed on top of 
=>> > the old one?
=>> > 
=>> > Anyone know what to do next?
=>> > 
=>> > TIA
=>> > 
=>> 
=>> kmod-nvidia is a metapackage, to deal with the screwy dependency issues that 
=>> result from having to ship an extra variant of the nvidia module every time 
=>> Nvidia decides to stop supporting another generation of less-than-bleeding-edge 
=>> hardware.  What you're seeing is normal, and your module is already installed. 
=>> Have fun with X configuration.
=>> 
=>> In other words, blame Nvidia.
=>
=>...Well, blame nVidia in part. We also need to blame pilot error on the
=>part of the OP.
=>
=>Indeed kmod-nvidia is a metapackage. Yum was used to install it, and it
=>did its job of pulling the appropriate dependent packages and keeping
=>those dependencies in place when rpm (and NOT yum) was used in an
=>attempt to remove the metapackage. Had yum been used, kmod-nvidia would
=>have been removed along with all of its dependent packages. Thus, this
=>metapackage, regardless of how ugly folks may think it to be, is working
=>as designed.
=>
=>As to why the accelerated nVidia drivers did not work, there could be
=>several causes ranging from them not having been given a chance to load
=>(I usually reboot - even though I don't have to - to let everything load
=>up in a desired order) to that the wrong nVidia drivers were installed
=>(old cards can't use the new drivers last time I checked).
=>
=>We just don't have enough information to say based on the information
=>here.

I'm happy to provide whatever else I can. What do you need to know to go 
further?

-- 
Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have  .0.
happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Organ ..0
Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all- 000
individuals! What if this weren't a hypothetical question?
steveo at syslang.net

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux