Re: Fedora 9 32 or 64 Bit - Which One?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Matthew Flaschen <matthew.flaschen <at> gatech.edu> writes:
> I like how you keep saying "all the benchmarks" and keep not linking to
> a single one.

Sorry, but I read them some time ago, so I remember the results, but not the 
URLs.

> For the average desktop user, 64-bit has little or no benefit and is not
> worth the hassles of dealing with incompatible proprietary code (and
> yes, there is a hassle).

There is no hassle. Everything just works. For "incompatible proprietary code", 
there are 32-bit multilibs. (Not that you should use proprietary crap in the 
first place, but it _does_ work on 64-bit just as well as on 32-bit. If it is 
not compatible with the current Fedora, it won't run on the 32-bit edition 
either.)

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux