On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 5:27 PM, Mikkel L. Ellertson <mikkel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Arthur Pemberton wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan >> <pocallaghan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 12:24 -0600, linuxguy wrote: >>>> What is totally unacceptable is to ship an OS that totally lacks the >>>> very basic functionality that one uses everyday. >>> KDE is not an OS. >> >> I really didn't think anyone needed to address that. I kinda hopes the >> OP was trying to make some point by using that wording, which I simply >> didn't get. >> >> There are things that I don't like about KDE 4.1, speed is the biggest >> one, crap, it is not. >> > From this and other posts, I don't think the OP "gets" the Fedora > philosophy. Maybe Fedora is the wrong distribution for him? There is > a reason there is more then one Linux distribution. It lets you > chose the best match for your needs and desires. > > Mikkel > -- I don't think there will ever be a unified opinion on this KDE 4.x thing. I'll just keep going... and going. Maybe there should be a disclaimer in fine print: "Use at your own risk" ~af -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
