Arthur Pemberton wrote: > On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan > <pocallaghan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 12:24 -0600, linuxguy wrote: >>> What is totally unacceptable is to ship an OS that totally lacks the >>> very basic functionality that one uses everyday. >> KDE is not an OS. > > I really didn't think anyone needed to address that. I kinda hopes the > OP was trying to make some point by using that wording, which I simply > didn't get. > > There are things that I don't like about KDE 4.1, speed is the biggest > one, crap, it is not. > From this and other posts, I don't think the OP "gets" the Fedora philosophy. Maybe Fedora is the wrong distribution for him? There is a reason there is more then one Linux distribution. It lets you chose the best match for your needs and desires. Mikkel -- Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
