Re: non-disclosure of infrastructure problem a management issue?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 07:57:34 -0800,
  Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Without a policy document in place, we run the risk of different
> people blamelessly repeating history they personally did not live.
> Can't really expect people to have read the specific griping in this
> thread, several years later.  The expectation on incident reporting
> performance must be documented and agreed to as part of a workable
> process for the Project.  If that doesn't happen, if you don't help
> make that happen, then there's no justifiable reason to expect things
> to be different next time.  Voicing a concern in meandering
> mailinglist thread is not crafting sustainable project policy.

Do you think you could get a copy of the process document that was used
in this incident (or perhaps a redacted version of it) that we could
use as a starting point?

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux