Re: non-disclosure of infrastructure problem a management issue?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Anders Karlsson wrote:
* Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> [20080825 16:06]:
Thomas Cameron wrote:
I understand
that the path to recovery from this kind of breach is incredibly
painful, and there are numerous folks managing that recovery.
Knowing that, doesn't it bother you that your system is very likely vulnerable to the same exploit - and that there are people who know how to do it?

You are making assumptions Les. You don't know how the perpetrator
gained access. (Well, I am assuming you don't, but if you do, feel
free to enlighten the rest of us.)

Agreed - I don't know. And that's a problem when someone else does know how to break into our systems - or we haven't been told that it was an inside job.

Until it's disclosed how (and where, when and why) - getting worked up
over it is wasted energy.

So is pretending that there is no reason to be concerned.

Congratulations on the very selective quoting as well.

It doesn't make any sense to point out how serious a problem a breakin is and then say everyone should just ignore it and go about their business.

--
  Les Mikesell
   lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux