Re: Now ON TOPIC, libGL.so, libMesaGL.so on missing list of F8 repo's

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Gene Heskett wrote, On 07/23/2008 04:52 PM:
On Wednesday 23 July 2008, Rick Stevens wrote:
<SNIP>
I don't have the -devel RPM installed.  My guess is that it's trying
to link against the 32-bit library which you don't have installed.
You might try:

	LDFLAGS="-L/usr/lib64 -lfaad2" make

to have it search the 64-bit stuff first.  Just a wild idea.

Too wild I think, this is a 32 bit machine, amd xp2800 TBE.

But: yumex says faad2 is installed, but locate can't find it! Mm, its libraries are not labeled faad2, just libfaad.


question: is faad2-devel installed?
(often the headers you need to develop [compile] against are in the devel package :)

And nm -D returns this:
[root@coyote gmerlin-all-in-one-20080715]# nm -D /usr/lib/libfaad.so.0.0.0 | grep faac
4948c170 T faacDecClose
4948c140 T faacDecDecode
4948b740 T faacDecGetCurrentConfiguration
4948b700 T faacDecGetErrorMessage
4948c460 T faacDecInit
4948c240 T faacDecInit2
4948c820 T faacDecOpen
4948b760 T faacDecPostSeekReset
4948c3d0 T faacDecSetConfiguration

So it is all there.  Me goes off scratching head in confusion.

Thanks Rick.  Any more ideas?



--
Todd Denniston
Crane Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC Crane)
Harnessing the Power of Technology for the Warfighter

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux