On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 3:25 AM, Chris G <cl@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 11:32:26PM -0400, max bianco wrote: > > > > > > Ultimately, if any of you folks reading this want to give your Internet access > > > a real kick in the rear end, get two connections and a load balancing router. > > > You don't know what you're missing until you've tried this stunt out. > > > > > > > > You've already got me thinking but, I want it with wireless, though i > > am not sure until I try. I wouldn't need to isp's though because I am > > not even getting the max speed out of one ISP with a wireless > > connection. I can have to NIC's in a box, can I have two wireless > > cards with separate ip's pulling down the info so i could effectively > > double my wireless connection speed? It seems plausible on the surface > > anyway. > > > Surely your connection to you ISP is *way* slower than even the > slowest wireless connection. Even an 11Mb/s wireless connection is > faster than all but the whizziest ISP connections. Are you *really* > getting slower than that on your wireless LAN? > Your right about that, except the connection at work is smokin but it would still be useful for large transfers across the LAN, music,movies, and such. Anyway I will start my own thread, as i am getting off on a tangent and hijacking this one it seems. Max -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
